What am I to think of "humane advocate protectors" that preaches the evils of dog crates...excuse me, they insist on using the term "cages" - and now come across a photo being circulated via social media that indicates a "humane advocate protector", a greyhound and a "cage" (??!!?!?) - again, their term, not mine - in the "humane advocate protectors" office.
Perplexed comes to mind
as well as hypocritical.
I do not crate my
greyhounds, so in my house you will not find a crate. But let us, for sake of
discussion, say that if I did use crates for my greyhounds you would expect to
find crates in my house. I have never thought that a crate was a
"cage". Many greyhound adoption programs suggest the use of crate to
their adopters as well as use industry standard crates for ex-racing greyhounds
awaiting forever homes. Point is, if someone uses a crate, you will find a crate
in this person's possession. If "humane advocate protectors" vilify the use of
crates you would not expect to come across photos of the "humane
advocate protectors" office with a crate...excuse
me..."cage" in it.
Would you expect to see
photos with what appears to be an industry crate with shredded paper in the
possession of a "humane advocate protectors" office that
has greyhound(s) there yet states:
“They are confined for
long hours each day, with shredded paper or carpet remnants as bedding”
In the name of TRANSPARANCY,
ACCOUNTABILITY AND INTEGRITY, I believe the public is owed a full and
unvarnished explanation as to why they may have a crate in the office and how
many hours a day are they possibly confining a greyhound in it and what exactly
are the dimensions of this crate? Sorry I keep saying crate. The "humane advocate protectors" insist on
calling it a "cage". Does that include when they themselves use
them?
So what’s next? Are we
going to discover that a ”humane
advocate protectors” founder/board member is involved in whippet racing………………?