Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Where in the world is W.W. Flicka?


****Update 4/14/2021 - See below for update****

As you can see in the above screen shots, this person claimed to be speaking on behalf of a greyhound named W.W. Flicka. This person is associated with an organization claiming to "protect dogs" in Florida.  Now I have to ask, if a person is claiming to be about protecting dogs and speaking for a particular dog, would not such a person do all they can to find a dog they admit they do not know the “whereabouts” of?

When I heard about this testimony my first thought was that something just didn't add up. Individuals and organizations want the public to think and vote the way they tell them regarding greyhound racing in Florida and yet, they do not know the current location and condition of W.W. Flicka, a greyhound they not only claim to speak for but that they use as a poster child against racing. Do they really not know or just lied during testimony?

With that in mind I set out to discover where in the world is W.W. Flicka.

I posed the question to someone in April 2018 and received an answer - W.W. Flicka is on the farm.

Ok...that was easy. 

In June 2018 I found myself in close proximity to the farm I was told that W.W. Flicka was at. I made a phone call and in less than 5 minutes I had the location verified. I then asked if I could visit and spend time with W.W. Flicka.

Without any hesitation the voice on the other end of the phone gave an enthusiastic "yes".

Ladies and gentleman, despite a particular person who claims to be speaking for W.W. Flicka, who stated for the record before the Florida Constitutional Committee that the whereabouts of W.W. Flicka was “unknown”, I am happy to report that W.W. Flicka whereabouts have never been unknown and all it took was asking one simple question.

W.W. Flicka is a happy, bouncy tiny girl who never stopped wagging her tail and giving kisses during my visit with her. Following are some photos of W.W. Flicka and myself taken by my wife who has granted me permission to reproduce the photos in this blog.  


So, the next time you are indoctrinated with rhetoric from those who seek to protect dogs by banning racing in addition to making no effort to back up claims of unknown locations, ask yourself, why was it easier for them to testify that W.W. Flicka's whereabouts were unknown when it was always known by those who truly care and love greyhounds. 

How is lying showing concern for the dogs? Why it's almost as if those who seek to destroy the greyhound industry wanted the public and the Florida Constitutional Committee to think that W.W. Flicka was missing...or worse.







Rory: From parts unknown...

 

Revisiting the WW’s Flicka blog from 2018. 

Some questions that still remain -

1.  Why was Flicka removed from Florida jurisdiction and moved to a farm with little to no oversite from any racing regulators? 

2.  Why didn’t the industry itself disclose the whereabouts of Flicka as soon as Flicka's whereabouts were publicly questioned?

3. Why did a person "from parts unknown" need to locate and disclose the whereabouts?

Not a can of worms I would want opened in oral arguments or in depositions.




#ProtectTheDogs, #ProtectTheGreyhounds, #VoteNoOn13, #FloridaCRC, #FloridaVotes

4 comments:

  1. Thank you for posting TRUTH.. over the liars that try to thwart us! THEY WILL NOT WIN THIS BATTLE. WW Flicka is obviously FINE and happy on the farm.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good sleuthing Rory! We all knew Flicka was most likely OK.... it's all those who choose to be fed information on the topic that believe their lies and lose their hard earned money donating to that cause. At least they don't have any of my $$$!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rory: From parts unknown...



    Revisiting the WW’s Flicka blog.


    Some questions that still remain -

    1. Why was Flicka removed from Florida jurisdiction and moved to a farm with little to no oversite from any racing regulators?

    2. Why didn’t the industry itself disclose the whereabouts of Flicka as soon as Flicka's whereabouts were publicly questioned?

    3. Why did a person "from parts unknown" need to locate and disclose the whereabouts?

    Not a can of worms I would want opened in oral arguments or in depositions.

    ReplyDelete